Tuesday, December 10, 2013

The Importance of Relative Standards in ADHD Diagnoses: Evidence Based on Exact Birth Dates


The Importance of Relative Standards in ADHD Diagnoses: Evidence Based on Exact Birth Dates

.....This paper presents evidence that diagnoses of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are driven largely by subjective comparisons across children in the same grade in school. Roughly 8.4 percent of children born in the month prior to their state’s cutoff date for kindergarten eligibility – who typically become the youngest and most developmentally immature children within a grade – are diagnosed with ADHD, compared to 5.1 percent of children born in the month immediately afterward. A child’s birth date relative to the eligibility cutoff also strongly influences teachers’ assessments of whether the child exhibits ADHD symptoms but is only weakly associated with similarly measured parental assessments, suggesting that many diagnoses may be driven by teachers’ perceptions of poor behavior among the youngest children in a classroom. These perceptions have long-lasting consequences: the youngest children in fifth and eighth grades are nearly twice as likely as their older classmates to regularly use stimulants prescribed to treat ADHD.....

Comments: Another reason to be suspicious of patients with a diagnosis of ADHD! No where does this article state that binocular vision problems can create ADHD-like symptoms. All children diagnosed with ADHD should have a full comprehensive eye and functional vision examination. All should have an objective assessment of behavior using tools like the TOVA (Test of Variables Attention). DM

No comments:

Post a Comment

You may comment on any aspect of this blog. You can not leave messages that promote or sell any service or product.